South africa must fix poverty before worrying about climate change

*

South africa must fix poverty before worrying about climate change *

Cutting emissions while helping vulnerable communities adapt to climate change is the best way to fight poverty. 

Compared with a 2°C world, limiting warming to 1.5°C could reduce the number of people exposed to climate risks AND vulnerable to poverty by an estimated 62 - 457 million worldwide. It would also reduce risks to food security, water security, health and livelihoods. 

Poorest communities are hardest hit by climate collapse. More than 5 million people live in informal settlements in South Africa, many in high-risk flood zones or on steep hillsides. They are most vulnerable to climate change impacts – including extreme heat, which can be life-threatening for shackdwellers – and have the least resources to avoid them or recover afterwards. 

While 62% economic losses from natural catastrophes were insured globally in 2025, in Africa only 0.5% of these losses were insured. When climate disaster strikes, vulnerable families lose homes, possessions, income and access to work, schools and healthcare. This drives the poverty cycle faster and further. 

A World Bank study found that climate change could push 32 to 132 million additional people into extreme poverty by 2030, with more than half of them in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. In South Africa, a 2023 peer-reviewed study warns that without strong climate action, global warming could reduce GDP by up to 43% by 2100. 

Unmitigated climate change would undo all poverty reduction progress to date. African countries are already losing 2–5% of their GDP annually to climate impacts – money that could be spent on poverty interventions. Between 1980 and 2021, 86 weather-related disasters cost South Africa R113 billion and affected more than 22 million people. For example, the April 2022 KwaZulu-Natal floods were made twice as likely by climate change and killed 544 people, hitting the poorer regions hardest.

But there is a solution: the best climate solutions simultaneously reduce poverty and create jobs. South Africa's eThekwini municipality created 800 green jobs through its Transformative Riverine Management Programme, while reducing climate disaster damage. The initiative won a global Development Project Award. Research from the Poverty Action Lab (the gold standard on evidence-based policy) shows that giving families cash aid before rather than after extreme weather events helps them recover faster and reduces long-term poverty.

Importantly, not every climate intervention automatically reduces poverty: only when climate policies are designed with vulnerable communities, can they deliver safer homes, healthier neighbourhoods, local livelihoods and greater resilience.

Scientists like those behind the IPCC call measures that tackle poverty and climate together  "climate-resilient development pathways”. These pathways use solutions including upgrading informal settlements with better drainage and evacuation routes; building climate-ready infrastructure, and establishing early warning systems. A just energy transition is not about choosing to prioritise climate over poverty. Our energy system is key: as the IPCC warns, all fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) must be phased out urgently to avoid dangerous warming. 

South Africa cannot choose between addressing poverty or climate action; both must be done, and the good news (as evidenced below) is that when done right, climate action is poverty action.

Still not convinced?